Why Distance Tables Mislead Shipping Emissions Reporting: The Case for Voyage-Level Data
When companies calculate shipping emissions reporting, they often rely on distance tables, fixed values that assume every voyage is “typical.” The problem? At sea, reality rarely matches the assumptions. And those gaps add up.
A Rotterdam–Singapore Example
Let’s take a shipment from Rotterdam to Singapore.
- Distance table: 15,650 km
- Actual AIS-recorded route: 18,000 km
- Vessel emissions factor: 50 g CO₂ per tonne-km
The difference:
- Distance table → 782.5 kg CO₂ per tonne
- Actual route → 900 kg CO₂ per tonne
Gap: +117.5 kg CO₂ per tonne (+15%)
That’s just one shipment. Multiply it across hundreds or thousands of containers, and suddenly your Scope 3 emissions reporting for ocean freight is significantly off, masking inefficiencies and potentially misleading customers who care about green performance.
Why It Happens
Ships don’t sail “by the book.” Weather, congestion, routing restrictions, and port calls mean actual distances often diverge from tables. But spotting those differences requires real voyage data.
And there’s a catch: raw AIS (Automatic Identification System) data is messy. It’s riddled with missing points, duplicates, and speed anomalies. Left unprocessed, it doesn’t deliver usable insights. That’s why cleaning, normalizing, and modeling AIS data is essential if you want accurate CO₂ emissions calculations in shipping.
The CargoFP Advantage
This is where Cargo FootPrint (CargoFP), built by OceanScore, comes in. CargoFP is designed to turn messy AIS streams into decision-ready voyage-level emissions data.
- Transforms raw AIS into clean, voyage-specific data
- Benchmarks real distances and emissions with a margin of error as low as 1.13%
- Gives forwarders and shippers actionable insights instead of assumptions
- Builds credibility with green-conscious customers by replacing averages with facts
Why It Matters
Industry averages and distance tables may be convenient, but they’re misleading. As our Scope 3 at Sea report shows, even on the same trade lanes, emissions intensity can vary by a factor of four depending on vessel utilisation, speed, and operating practices.
That’s why leading shippers are moving away from static estimates toward accurate shipping emissions data based on real voyages. Only with this level of visibility can you identify reduction opportunities, optimise procurement, and turn Scope 3 reporting from a regulatory burden into a competitive advantage.
Bottom Line
- Averages are convenient. Reality is precise.
- Your reporting credibility, green claims, and ability to cut emissions depend on real voyage data, cleaned, modeled, and verified.
If you’re ready to see what’s really happening at sea and build maritime Scope 3 reporting you can trust, it’s time to move beyond distance tables.