EU ETSeu ets managementgreek shippingmaritime datamaritime operationssupply chain
4 min read

Greek shipping getting to grips with EU ETS compliance issues amid mounting emissions costs, says OceanScore

Greek shipowners are facing an estimated €335m bill under the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) in 2024, potentially rising to €1bn by 2026. OceanScore highlights challenges with emissions data validation and the need for clear contractual arrangements to manage EUA costs.

Filip Lakomik
Greek shipowners face EU ETS costs, stressing data and contract management.

Validation of voyage emissions data and contractual arrangements for allocation of EU ETS costs remain key challenges for Greek shipowners as they face an estimated total €335m bill this year, potentially rising to €1bn once the regulation is fully implemented, according to OceanScore.

 

Some 2135 vessels owned or operated by around 400 Greek shipping companies are presently racking up liabilities under the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) that will require them to surrender EU Allowances (EUAs) next year for GHG emissions incurred during 2024.

 

Maritime data analytics firm OceanScore, a global provider of solutions for regulatory compliance with offices in Hamburg, Poland, Portugal and soon Singapore, has calculated that Greek owners will be required to surrender 11.96m EUAs, based on 2022 voyage data for Greek-owned ships sailing both within and to/from the EU/EEA.

 

High average cost per vessel

Given a current EUA price of around €70, this would result in total EUA costs of €335m for Greek shipping this year with 40% liability under the three-year phase-in of the EU ETS, increasing to €586m in 2025 with 70% exposure and €837m with full implementation in 2026 – though a moderate hop in the volatile EUA price could easily take this figure north of €1bn.

 

This would equate to an average emissions cost of nearly €400,000 per vessel once the EU ETS is fully implemented, though ships with green technology to curb emissions would clearly have much lower EUA exposure. 

 

“Nonetheless, this will amount to significant additional liabilities related to emissions for many Greek shipping players that are active across most segments, predominantly the tanker and bulk trades, and will necessitate measures to mitigate their financial risk and limit exposure to the EU ETS,” says OceanScore’s co-Managing Director Ralf Garrn.

 

Typical emissions liabilities

More than 500 of the overall tally of Greek-owned vessels impacted by the EU ETS are in the hands of the 10 largest players, including Eastern Mediterranean, Minerva Marine, TMS Group and Thenamaris Ships Management.

 

An analysis carried out by OceanScore of the impact of the EU ETS on one typical Greek shipowner with 50 vessels shows that it would incur emissions liabilities of €18.5m from the requirement to purchase around 265,000 EUAs at full implementation based on the current EUA price.

 

OceanScore is seeing variable states of EU ETS readiness at Greek shipping companies, with a prevalent “wait-and-see” attitude, in common with much of the industry as it is still getting to grips with the complexities of the regulation, the impact on charter parties and the requirements for compliance, according to Garrn.

 

End-to-end solution

The company is now supporting the EU ETS compliance efforts of over 70 global clients, representing more than 1000 vessels, which have taken onboard its web-based digital tool ETS Manager that automates the various processes to provide a streamlined end-to-end solution for simplified management of EUA allocation and collection among stakeholders, with integrated EUA trading. 

 

“It is therefore essential for Greek shipowners to finalise charter parties that incorporate EU ETS clauses to properly assign accountability for voyage EUA costs between themselves and the charterer so they can accurately determine their financial risk,” Garrn says.

 

“Commercial contracts need to be in place because, otherwise, the shipowner as the Document of Compliance holder can be left with having to bear the burden of EUA liabilities and possibly resorting to litigation against the charterer to recover emissions costs that are owed. But costs liability may be difficult to prove in a legal case long after the voyage has been completed.”

 

Need for data validation

This makes it important for shipping companies to have accurate real-time emissions data communicated from ship to shore for verification to support correct allocation of EUA costs among voyage stakeholders, also taking into account off-hires, Garrn says.

 

“It is good to see that a number of Greek shipowners are making strong progress in upgrading the quality of vessel data that needs to be fed via an API to the verification body,” he says.

 

Data validation with an accredited verifier is incorporated in ETS Manager, which provides efficient and transparent processes between owners, managers and charterers to manage EUAs and maintain control of EU ETS costs and related risks.

 

“Having an effective administrative system in place to track and allocate EUAs based on reliable operational data is essential to determine accountability with the EU ETS and thereby minimise financial risk,” Garrn says.

 

Proper data management will also be a vital prerequisite to tackle the upcoming FuelEU Maritime to be implemented from 2025, he adds, with OceanScore preparing to launch later this year its new digital solution FuelEU Planner to facilitate compliance with this complex regulation.

 

For more information contact:

Candice Buckle, Marketing Manager, OceanScore.

Email: candice.buckle@oceanscore.com

 

Related posts

class nkEU ETSFuelEUmaritime datamaritime operationsPartnershipsupply chain
2 min read

ClassNK and OceanScore ink collaboration for data-driven regulatory compliance

A collaboration agreement has been signed between a classification society ClassNK and a maritime data and technology firm OceanScore to…

Filip Lakomik
4 min read

Maritime Compliance in 2026: What Commercial and Technical Teams Need to Prepare For

2026 will be a decisive year for maritime compliance. As FuelEU Maritime completes its first compliance cycle, EU ETS reaches…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUFuelEU PoolingOPX
1 min read

OceanScore Pool-Price Index Market Commentary: November 2025

With the ability to generate additional surplus limited by the approaching year-end, and demand picking up, prices for pooling edged…

Albrecht Grell
3 min read

FuelEU Maritime Forecasting: Managing Compliance Exposure Before It Becomes a Cost

FuelEU Maritime exposure develops continuously throughout the year. This article explains how compliance forecasting helps shipping companies manage cost, risk,…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUpooling
3 min read

Pooling Compliance Balances in Time Charters: Key Risks and Negotiation Tips

With verification according to EU ETS completed for most shipping companies, a critical assessment of EUA buying strategies is a…

Filip Lakomik
compliance manager
3 min read

Forecasting for Maritime Compliance: A Closer Look Inside OceanScore’s Compliance Manager

A Forecasting Module That Earns Global Praise OceanScore’s Compliance Manager entails a forecasting module for maritime compliance that is receiving…

Filip Lakomik
3 min read

EU ETS and FuelEU Compliance: How One Ship Manager Regained Commercial Control

EU ETS and FuelEU compliance is no longer a side process. For shipping companies, it now directly affects cash flow,…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUFuelEU Pooling
2 min read

FuelEU Maritime Charterer Pooling: Will Your Charterer Pool?

As the first FuelEU Maritime compliance year comes to a close, the reality of pooling is taking shape. Based on…

Filip Lakomik
Cargo ship navigating EU ETS compliance.
complex regulationseu allowance euaeu emissionsmonitoring planshipping companies
5 min read

OceanScore identifies EU ETS best practice to tackle ‘strategy gaps’ on compliance

Many shipping companies are still striving to define their strategy for EU ETS compliance some 80 days after implementation of…

Filip Lakomik
European Union emissions tradingFuelEUmaritime datamaritime operationsmodel pricepenaltiespooling
6 min read

OceanScore models price scenario for FuelEU pooling as alternative to penalties

OceanScore provides insights on compliance surpluses and price clarity for FuelEU Maritime's pooling mechanism, offering shipping companies cost-effective compliance solutions.

Filip Lakomik
Turn obligation into opportunity

Turn obligation into opportunity

Explore our maritime emissions compliance solutions designed to meet evolving regulations like EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime.

our clients and partners