EmissionsEU ETSEUAs
2 min read

Getting up to speed with the EU ETS: a guide to best practice

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant liabilities for the industry due to the requirement for shipping companies to purchase carbon credits to compensate for their annual emissions.    This presents a new set of challenges for shipping companies such as determining […]

Filip Lakomik
Shipping companies face compliance challenges under the EU ETS, requiring carbon credit purchases, data verification, and cost allocation strategies. Learn how to navigate these complexities.

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant liabilities for the industry due to the requirement for shipping companies to purchase carbon credits to compensate for their annual emissions. 

 

This presents a new set of challenges for shipping companies such as determining who is responsible for compliance with the EU ETS, who should pay for emissions, what contractual obligations need to be in place, data-handling and verification procedures, how to procure carbon credits, what trading platform to use and how to allocate costs across the value chain. 

 

In order to navigate these myriad complexities, administrative systems need to be set up with digital automation of the various processes to effectively manage and mitigate the risks and ensure efficient compliance with the regulation, given non-compliance can incur heavy financial penalties or even an EU trading ban for an entire fleet. 

 

OceanScore has been supporting dozens of partners in efficiently managing compliance with this regulation and securing end-to-end transparency to limit the inherent risks. In this series of blogs, we share some of our insights for EU ETS best practice to clarify the steps required.  

While not definitive, as the diverse nature of shipping requires a tailored approach, it is intended as a useful guide to help companies define their EU ETS strategy and avoid some of the pitfalls on the difficult path to compliance. 

Related posts

OceanScore’s review of BIMCO’s FuelEU Maritime clause and its challenges.
carbon marketcarbon priceEmissionseu carbonEU ETSEuropean Commissionshipping companiesverified emissions
3 min read

EU ETS & MRV in Shipping: Defining Responsibility Between Owners and Managers

Shipping companies need to establish clear lines of responsibility both for reporting emissions under the EU’s MRV (Monitoring, Reporting and…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUFuelEU PoolingOPX
1 min read

OceanScore Pool-Price Index Market Commentary: November 2025

With the ability to generate additional surplus limited by the approaching year-end, and demand picking up, prices for pooling edged…

Albrecht Grell
FuelEUpooling
4 min read

FuelEU Maritime Pooling: A Viable Strategy

FuelEU allows for pooling compliance deficits and surpluses as one way to secure compliance. OceanScore analyses continues to show that…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEU pooling marketplace
5 min read

Maritime Compliance Trading: Turning Emissions Rules into Carbon Opportunities and Marketplaces

The Regulatory Landscape: Fast, Complex, and Overlapping   Regulation in maritime decarbonisation continues at unrelenting speed, and with it, the…

Filip Lakomik
eu regulationsFuelEUfueleu maritime regulationfueleu plannermaritime data
8 min read

The price of pooling: OceanScore takes market-based approach to FuelEU Maritime

FuelEU Maritime introduces new shipping regulations, offering compliance pooling benefits. OceanScore analyzes surplus pricing and market dynamics.

Filip Lakomik
EU ETS compliance: Setting up a Maritime Operator Holding Account (MOHA) and Union Registry trading account for shipping companies.
cap and trade systemEmissionseu emissionseu emissions trading systemEU ETSEUAsinnovation fundtrading period
3 min read

Setting up accounts for EUAs

Shipping companies operating under the EU ETS will be required to open a Maritime Operator Holding Account (MOHA) for the…

Filip Lakomik
Stakeholders in the shipping industry discussing EUA cost allocation under EU ETS.
Best Practicescarbon marketEmissionseu carboneu emissionseu emissions trading systemEU ETSEUAsFuelEUfueleu maritime regulation
3 min read

Securing contractual clauses for EUA costs settlement 

Acquisition of EUAs constitutes a major cost burden for the responsible party so these costs need to be fairly allocated…

Filip Lakomik
European Union emissions tradingFuelEUmaritime datamaritime operationsmodel pricepenaltiespooling
6 min read

OceanScore models price scenario for FuelEU pooling as alternative to penalties

OceanScore provides insights on compliance surpluses and price clarity for FuelEU Maritime's pooling mechanism, offering shipping companies cost-effective compliance solutions.

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUFuelEU PoolingOPX
2 min read

OceanScore Pool-Price Index Market Commentary: January 2026

FuelEU pooling prices declined in January 2026 as surplus volumes increased following completion of the first compliance period. OceanScore’s OPX…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUfueleu maritime regulationmaritime datamaritime operationsmaritime regulation
5 min read

OceanScore calculates €175m potential costs for Greek shipping with FuelEU Maritime

Greek shipping companies may face over €175m in penalties under FuelEU Maritime. OceanScore provides tools to optimize fuel selection, reduce…

Filip Lakomik
Turn obligation into opportunity

Turn obligation into opportunity

Explore our maritime emissions compliance solutions designed to meet evolving regulations like EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime.

our clients and partners