EmissionsEU ETSEUAs
2 min read

Getting up to speed with the EU ETS: a guide to best practice

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant liabilities for the industry due to the requirement for shipping companies to purchase carbon credits to compensate for their annual emissions.    This presents a new set of challenges for shipping companies such as determining […]

Filip Lakomik
Shipping companies face compliance challenges under the EU ETS, requiring carbon credit purchases, data verification, and cost allocation strategies. Learn how to navigate these complexities.

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant liabilities for the industry due to the requirement for shipping companies to purchase carbon credits to compensate for their annual emissions. 

 

This presents a new set of challenges for shipping companies such as determining who is responsible for compliance with the EU ETS, who should pay for emissions, what contractual obligations need to be in place, data-handling and verification procedures, how to procure carbon credits, what trading platform to use and how to allocate costs across the value chain. 

 

In order to navigate these myriad complexities, administrative systems need to be set up with digital automation of the various processes to effectively manage and mitigate the risks and ensure efficient compliance with the regulation, given non-compliance can incur heavy financial penalties or even an EU trading ban for an entire fleet. 

 

OceanScore has been supporting dozens of partners in efficiently managing compliance with this regulation and securing end-to-end transparency to limit the inherent risks. In this series of blogs, we share some of our insights for EU ETS best practice to clarify the steps required.  

While not definitive, as the diverse nature of shipping requires a tailored approach, it is intended as a useful guide to help companies define their EU ETS strategy and avoid some of the pitfalls on the difficult path to compliance. 

Related posts

EU ETS compliance: Setting up a Maritime Operator Holding Account (MOHA) and Union Registry trading account for shipping companies.
cap and trade systemEmissionseu emissionseu emissions trading systemEU ETSEUAsinnovation fundtrading period
3 min read

Setting up accounts for EUAs

Shipping companies operating under the EU ETS will be required to open a Maritime Operator Holding Account (MOHA) for the…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUFuelEU PoolingOPX
2 min read

OceanScore Pool-Price Index Market Commentary: February 2026

After compliance balances were closed at year-end, additional 2025 surplus volumes were released to the market in January. This increase…

Damla Hasenclever
fueleu maritime regulationshipping
4 min read

FuelEU Maritime Regulation: How the Shipping Industry Could Profit €250M Instead of Losing Money

FuelEU is not just a cost to shipping (in contrast to EU ETS, for example), it does actually inject money…

Filip Lakomik
cap and trade systemcarbon energy demonstration projectsetsets managereu emissions trading systemEU ETSeuropean unionshipping companies
4 min read

Managing data and finding the right digital solution

The EU ETS necessitates that shipping companies implement a reliable EU ETS data management solution to handle complex administrative processes…

Filip Lakomik
3 min read

UK ETS Maritime: Preparing for a Confirmed 1 July 2026 Start

The UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) for maritime is now confirmed to launch on 1 July 2026, introducing new…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUFuelEU Pooling
5 min read

FuelEU Maritime Compliance: Why Pooling Is Infinitely Better Than Paying the Penalty

As global trade grows and decarbonization pressures increase, the shipping industry is facing heightened scrutiny over its environmental impact. At…

Filip Lakomik
Ships plying the Red Sea route to Europe are running the gauntlet of Houthi missile attacks in the Bab-el-Mandeb strait. Image: Shutterstock
emissions trading system eueu allowance euaEU ETSeu ets managementRed Sea crises
4 min read

OceanScore analysis shows near-tripling of EU ETS costs due to Red Sea crisis

Houthi missile attacks on Red Sea shipping routes lead to higher emissions and increased costs for shipping companies under the…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEU pooling marketplace
5 min read

Maritime Compliance Trading: Turning Emissions Rules into Carbon Opportunities and Marketplaces

The Regulatory Landscape: Fast, Complex, and Overlapping   Regulation in maritime decarbonisation continues at unrelenting speed, and with it, the…

Filip Lakomik
fueleu charter party clausesfueleu maritime regulation
4 min read

De-Risk Your FuelEU Charter Party Clauses: Navigate Complexity with Confidence

As the maritime industry adapts to new environmental regulations, FuelEU Charter Party clauses have emerged as a significant challenge for…

Filip Lakomik
Shipping industry professionals discussing EUA procurement strategies and emissions cost management.
carbon dioxide equivalentEmissionsemissions trading system eueu emissionseu emissions trading systemEU ETSEUAsEuropean Union emissions tradingsecondary market
3 min read

EUA Trading Strategy for Shipping: How to Buy EU Allowances Efficiently

EUAs can be purchased at a fixed price at auctions arranged during the year by the European Energy Exchange. They…

Filip Lakomik
Turn obligation into opportunity

Turn obligation into opportunity

Explore our maritime emissions compliance solutions designed to meet evolving regulations like EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime.

our clients and partners