EmissionsEU ETSEUAs
2 min read

Getting up to speed with the EU ETS: a guide to best practice

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant liabilities for the industry due to the requirement for shipping companies to purchase carbon credits to compensate for their annual emissions.    This presents a new set of challenges for shipping companies such as determining […]

Filip Lakomik
Shipping companies face compliance challenges under the EU ETS, requiring carbon credit purchases, data verification, and cost allocation strategies. Learn how to navigate these complexities.

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant liabilities for the industry due to the requirement for shipping companies to purchase carbon credits to compensate for their annual emissions. 

 

This presents a new set of challenges for shipping companies such as determining who is responsible for compliance with the EU ETS, who should pay for emissions, what contractual obligations need to be in place, data-handling and verification procedures, how to procure carbon credits, what trading platform to use and how to allocate costs across the value chain. 

 

In order to navigate these myriad complexities, administrative systems need to be set up with digital automation of the various processes to effectively manage and mitigate the risks and ensure efficient compliance with the regulation, given non-compliance can incur heavy financial penalties or even an EU trading ban for an entire fleet. 

 

OceanScore has been supporting dozens of partners in efficiently managing compliance with this regulation and securing end-to-end transparency to limit the inherent risks. In this series of blogs, we share some of our insights for EU ETS best practice to clarify the steps required.  

While not definitive, as the diverse nature of shipping requires a tailored approach, it is intended as a useful guide to help companies define their EU ETS strategy and avoid some of the pitfalls on the difficult path to compliance. 

Related posts

fueleu maritime regulationshipping
4 min read

FuelEU Maritime Regulation: How the Shipping Industry Could Profit €250M Instead of Losing Money

FuelEU is not just a cost to shipping (in contrast to EU ETS, for example), it does actually inject money…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUpooling
3 min read

Pooling Compliance Balances in Time Charters: Key Risks and Negotiation Tips

With verification according to EU ETS completed for most shipping companies, a critical assessment of EUA buying strategies is a…

Filip Lakomik
emissions trading system euEU ETSeu regulationslngmaritime datamaritime operations
8 min read

Capitalizing on the benefits as EU regulations offer LNG bunkering boost

OceanScore examines the financial benefits of LNG under EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime regulations, focusing on compliance surpluses, pooling opportunities,…

Filip Lakomik
EU ETSeu ets managementFuelEUmaritime datamaritime operationsoceanscoreshipping companies
5 min read

EU ETS Management for Shipping: Why Companies Are Adopting OceanScore’s ETS Manager

A collaboration agreement has been signed between a classification society ClassNK and a maritime data and technology firm OceanScore to…

Filip Lakomik
EU ETS compliance: Setting up a Maritime Operator Holding Account (MOHA) and Union Registry trading account for shipping companies.
cap and trade systemEmissionseu emissionseu emissions trading systemEU ETSEUAsinnovation fundtrading period
3 min read

Setting up accounts for EUAs

Shipping companies operating under the EU ETS will be required to open a Maritime Operator Holding Account (MOHA) for the…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUFuelEU PoolingOPX
2 min read

OceanScore Pool-Price Index Market Commentary: February 2026

After compliance balances were closed at year-end, additional 2025 surplus volumes were released to the market in January. This increase…

Damla Hasenclever
FuelEUfueleu maritime regulationimointernational maritime organisationshipping challenges
2 min read

FuelEU Maritime: 4 Pressing Challenges Facing Shipping in 2025

FuelEU Charter Party impact shipping compliance costs. OceanScore’s FuelEU Planner helps with cost risks & pooling strategies with precision

Filip Lakomik
The EU ETS poses a costs management challenge for shipping companies, according to OceanScore co-Managing Director Albrecht Grell.
emissions trading system euEU ETSeu ets managementfinancial blancingshipping companies
6 min read

Shipping companies must manage financial balancing act on EU ETS tightrope, says OceanScore

Shipping companies face rising costs and risks from the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) in 2026, with higher carbon…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUFuelEU PoolingOPX
2 min read

OceanScore Pool-Price Index Market Commentary: December 2025

With the ability to generate additional surplus limited by the approaching year-end, and demand picking up, prices for pooling edged…

Filip Lakomik
imomaritime regulationMEPC
2 min read

OceanScore’s commentary on MEPC ES and IMO NZF

The IMO’s Net Zero Framework is effectively dead, and the broader role of the MEPC is now in question. Friday’s…

Filip Lakomik
Turn obligation into opportunity

Turn obligation into opportunity

Explore our maritime emissions compliance solutions designed to meet evolving regulations like EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime.

our clients and partners