EmissionsEU ETSEUAs
2 min read

Getting up to speed with the EU ETS: a guide to best practice

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant liabilities for the industry due to the requirement for shipping companies to purchase carbon credits to compensate for their annual emissions.    This presents a new set of challenges for shipping companies such as determining […]

Filip Lakomik
Shipping companies face compliance challenges under the EU ETS, requiring carbon credit purchases, data verification, and cost allocation strategies. Learn how to navigate these complexities.

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant liabilities for the industry due to the requirement for shipping companies to purchase carbon credits to compensate for their annual emissions. 

 

This presents a new set of challenges for shipping companies such as determining who is responsible for compliance with the EU ETS, who should pay for emissions, what contractual obligations need to be in place, data-handling and verification procedures, how to procure carbon credits, what trading platform to use and how to allocate costs across the value chain. 

 

In order to navigate these myriad complexities, administrative systems need to be set up with digital automation of the various processes to effectively manage and mitigate the risks and ensure efficient compliance with the regulation, given non-compliance can incur heavy financial penalties or even an EU trading ban for an entire fleet. 

 

OceanScore has been supporting dozens of partners in efficiently managing compliance with this regulation and securing end-to-end transparency to limit the inherent risks. In this series of blogs, we share some of our insights for EU ETS best practice to clarify the steps required.  

While not definitive, as the diverse nature of shipping requires a tailored approach, it is intended as a useful guide to help companies define their EU ETS strategy and avoid some of the pitfalls on the difficult path to compliance. 

Related posts

The EU ETS poses a costs management challenge for shipping companies, according to OceanScore co-Managing Director Albrecht Grell.
emissions trading system euEU ETSeu ets managementfinancial blancingshipping companies
6 min read

Shipping companies must manage financial balancing act on EU ETS tightrope, says OceanScore

Shipping companies face rising costs and risks from the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) in 2026, with higher carbon…

Filip Lakomik
EU ETS compliance: Setting up a Maritime Operator Holding Account (MOHA) and Union Registry trading account for shipping companies.
cap and trade systemEmissionseu emissionseu emissions trading systemEU ETSEUAsinnovation fundtrading period
3 min read

Setting up accounts for EUAs

Shipping companies operating under the EU ETS will be required to open a Maritime Operator Holding Account (MOHA) for the…

Filip Lakomik
Compliance ForecasterFuelEU
3 min read

FuelEU Maritime Forecasting: Managing Compliance Exposure Before It Becomes a Cost

FuelEU Maritime exposure develops continuously throughout the year. This article explains how compliance forecasting helps shipping companies manage cost, risk,…

Damla Hasenclever
FuelEUpooling
3 min read

Pooling Compliance Balances in Time Charters: Key Risks and Negotiation Tips

With verification according to EU ETS completed for most shipping companies, a critical assessment of EUA buying strategies is a…

Filip Lakomik
uk ets
5 min read

UK ETS Maritime Expansion: Key Updates and Compliance Strategies

The UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) is set to expand to the maritime sector from 2026, introducing new carbon…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUFuelEU Pooling
5 min read

FuelEU Maritime Compliance: Why Pooling Is Infinitely Better Than Paying the Penalty

As global trade grows and decarbonization pressures increase, the shipping industry is facing heightened scrutiny over its environmental impact. At…

Filip Lakomik
OceanScore’s review of BIMCO’s FuelEU Maritime clause and its challenges.
carbon marketcarbon priceEmissionseu carbonEU ETSEuropean Commissionshipping companiesverified emissions
3 min read

EU ETS & MRV in Shipping: Defining Responsibility Between Owners and Managers

Shipping companies need to establish clear lines of responsibility both for reporting emissions under the EU’s MRV (Monitoring, Reporting and…

Filip Lakomik
cargoeu emissions trading systemEuropean Commissiongreenhouse gas emissionsmaritime operationsmaritime operator holdingshipping companiesunion registry
5 min read

EU ETS Best Practices for Shipping: Lessons Learned After Implementation

OceanScore has been assessing early experiences as companies adapt to the EU ETS post-implementation, based on feedback from over 70…

Filip Lakomik
fueleu charter party clausesfueleu maritime regulation
4 min read

De-Risk Your FuelEU Charter Party Clauses: Navigate Complexity with Confidence

As the maritime industry adapts to new environmental regulations, FuelEU Charter Party clauses have emerged as a significant challenge for…

Filip Lakomik
3 min read

OceanScore September Highlights: FuelEU Pooling Transparency & Shipping Compliance Updates

September 2025 was a month of milestones for OceanScore, from the launch of OPX (, our transparent FuelEU Pool-Price Index, to…

Filip Lakomik
Turn obligation into opportunity

Turn obligation into opportunity

Explore our maritime emissions compliance solutions designed to meet evolving regulations like EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime.

our clients and partners