EmissionsEU ETSEUAs
2 min read

Getting up to speed with the EU ETS: a guide to best practice

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant liabilities for the industry due to the requirement for shipping companies to purchase carbon credits to compensate for their annual emissions.    This presents a new set of challenges for shipping companies such as determining […]

Filip Lakomik
Shipping companies face compliance challenges under the EU ETS, requiring carbon credit purchases, data verification, and cost allocation strategies. Learn how to navigate these complexities.

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant liabilities for the industry due to the requirement for shipping companies to purchase carbon credits to compensate for their annual emissions. 

 

This presents a new set of challenges for shipping companies such as determining who is responsible for compliance with the EU ETS, who should pay for emissions, what contractual obligations need to be in place, data-handling and verification procedures, how to procure carbon credits, what trading platform to use and how to allocate costs across the value chain. 

 

In order to navigate these myriad complexities, administrative systems need to be set up with digital automation of the various processes to effectively manage and mitigate the risks and ensure efficient compliance with the regulation, given non-compliance can incur heavy financial penalties or even an EU trading ban for an entire fleet. 

 

OceanScore has been supporting dozens of partners in efficiently managing compliance with this regulation and securing end-to-end transparency to limit the inherent risks. In this series of blogs, we share some of our insights for EU ETS best practice to clarify the steps required.  

While not definitive, as the diverse nature of shipping requires a tailored approach, it is intended as a useful guide to help companies define their EU ETS strategy and avoid some of the pitfalls on the difficult path to compliance. 

Related posts

FuelEUFuelEU Pooling
2 min read

OceanScore Pool-Price Index Market Commentary: August 2025

As global trade grows and decarbonization pressures increase, the shipping industry is facing heightened scrutiny over its environmental impact. At…

Albrecht Grell
Cargo ship navigating EU ETS compliance.
complex regulationseu allowance euaeu emissionsmonitoring planshipping companies
5 min read

OceanScore identifies EU ETS best practice to tackle ‘strategy gaps’ on compliance

Many shipping companies are still striving to define their strategy for EU ETS compliance some 80 days after implementation of…

Filip Lakomik
3 min read

EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime: Challenges and Opportunities for Asian Shipping

Asian shipowners face unique challenges as EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime take full effect. Fewer European voyages, complex Union Registry…

Filip Lakomik
Stakeholders in the shipping industry discussing EUA cost allocation under EU ETS.
Best Practicescarbon marketEmissionseu carboneu emissionseu emissions trading systemEU ETSEUAsFuelEUfueleu maritime regulation
3 min read

Securing contractual clauses for EUA costs settlement 

Acquisition of EUAs constitutes a major cost burden for the responsible party so these costs need to be fairly allocated…

Filip Lakomik
emissions trading system euEU ETSeu regulationslngmaritime datamaritime operations
8 min read

Capitalizing on the benefits as EU regulations offer LNG bunkering boost

OceanScore examines the financial benefits of LNG under EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime regulations, focusing on compliance surpluses, pooling opportunities,…

Filip Lakomik
EU ETS compliance: Setting up a Maritime Operator Holding Account (MOHA) and Union Registry trading account for shipping companies.
cap and trade systemEmissionseu emissionseu emissions trading systemEU ETSEUAsinnovation fundtrading period
3 min read

Setting up accounts for EUAs

Shipping companies operating under the EU ETS will be required to open a Maritime Operator Holding Account (MOHA) for the…

Filip Lakomik
imomaritime regulationMEPC
2 min read

OceanScore’s commentary on MEPC ES and IMO NZF

The IMO’s Net Zero Framework is effectively dead, and the broader role of the MEPC is now in question. Friday’s…

Filip Lakomik
3 min read

EU ETS and FuelEU Compliance Risk When Compliance Depends on One Person

When EU ETS and FuelEU compliance depends on a single individual, commercial risk increases quickly. This real case from a…

Filip Lakomik
emissions trading scheme ukgreenhouse gas emissions permitJanuary 2021participation in the euuk emissions trading schemeuk ets
9 min read

UK ETS Can Nudge Shipping Towards Decarbonisation, But Won’t Suffice on Its Own

EUAs can be purchased at a fixed price at auctions arranged during the year by the European Energy Exchange. They…

Filip Lakomik
EU ETSFuelEUFuelEU pooling marketplace
3 min read

How Shipping Companies Can Turn FuelEU Maritime Compliance Into a €500M Profit Opportunity 

As global trade grows and decarbonization pressures increase, the shipping industry is facing heightened scrutiny over its environmental impact. At…

Filip Lakomik
Turn obligation into opportunity

Turn obligation into opportunity

Explore our maritime emissions compliance solutions designed to meet evolving regulations like EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime.

our clients and partners