EmissionsEU ETSEUAs
2 min read

Getting up to speed with the EU ETS: a guide to best practice

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant liabilities for the industry due to the requirement for shipping companies to purchase carbon credits to compensate for their annual emissions.    This presents a new set of challenges for shipping companies such as determining […]

Filip Lakomik
Shipping companies face compliance challenges under the EU ETS, requiring carbon credit purchases, data verification, and cost allocation strategies. Learn how to navigate these complexities.

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant liabilities for the industry due to the requirement for shipping companies to purchase carbon credits to compensate for their annual emissions. 

 

This presents a new set of challenges for shipping companies such as determining who is responsible for compliance with the EU ETS, who should pay for emissions, what contractual obligations need to be in place, data-handling and verification procedures, how to procure carbon credits, what trading platform to use and how to allocate costs across the value chain. 

 

In order to navigate these myriad complexities, administrative systems need to be set up with digital automation of the various processes to effectively manage and mitigate the risks and ensure efficient compliance with the regulation, given non-compliance can incur heavy financial penalties or even an EU trading ban for an entire fleet. 

 

OceanScore has been supporting dozens of partners in efficiently managing compliance with this regulation and securing end-to-end transparency to limit the inherent risks. In this series of blogs, we share some of our insights for EU ETS best practice to clarify the steps required.  

While not definitive, as the diverse nature of shipping requires a tailored approach, it is intended as a useful guide to help companies define their EU ETS strategy and avoid some of the pitfalls on the difficult path to compliance. 

Related posts

3 min read

EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime: Challenges and Opportunities for Asian Shipping

Asian shipowners face unique challenges as EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime take full effect. Fewer European voyages, complex Union Registry…

Filip Lakomik
DoC HolderEU ETSFuelEUfueleu maritime regulationimoMEPC83
3 min read

MEPC 83: The New Global Carbon Rules

MEPC83 approves complex global GHG reduction rules for shipping, introducing dual thresholds, remedial units, and a FuelEU-like system starting 2028.

Filip Lakomik
Ships plying the Red Sea route to Europe are running the gauntlet of Houthi missile attacks in the Bab-el-Mandeb strait. Image: Shutterstock
emissions trading system eueu allowance euaEU ETSeu ets managementRed Sea crises
4 min read

OceanScore analysis shows near-tripling of EU ETS costs due to Red Sea crisis

Houthi missile attacks on Red Sea shipping routes lead to higher emissions and increased costs for shipping companies under the…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUFuelEU Pooling
2 min read

OceanScore Pool-Price Index Market Commentary: October 2025

As global trade grows and decarbonization pressures increase, the shipping industry is facing heightened scrutiny over its environmental impact. At…

Albrecht Grell
4 min read

Maritime Compliance in 2026: What Commercial and Technical Teams Need to Prepare For

2026 will be a decisive year for maritime compliance. As FuelEU Maritime completes its first compliance cycle, EU ETS reaches…

Filip Lakomik
European Union emissions tradingFuelEUmaritime datamaritime operationsmodel pricepenaltiespooling
6 min read

OceanScore models price scenario for FuelEU pooling as alternative to penalties

OceanScore provides insights on compliance surpluses and price clarity for FuelEU Maritime's pooling mechanism, offering shipping companies cost-effective compliance solutions.

Filip Lakomik
OceanScore’s review of BIMCO’s FuelEU Maritime clause and its challenges.
carbon marketcarbon priceEmissionseu carbonEU ETSEuropean Commissionshipping companiesverified emissions
3 min read

EU ETS & MRV in Shipping: Defining Responsibility Between Owners and Managers

Shipping companies need to establish clear lines of responsibility both for reporting emissions under the EU’s MRV (Monitoring, Reporting and…

Filip Lakomik
Stakeholders in the shipping industry discussing EUA cost allocation under EU ETS.
Best Practicescarbon marketEmissionseu carboneu emissionseu emissions trading systemEU ETSEUAsFuelEUfueleu maritime regulation
3 min read

Securing contractual clauses for EUA costs settlement 

Acquisition of EUAs constitutes a major cost burden for the responsible party so these costs need to be fairly allocated…

Filip Lakomik
Djibouti carbon pricingmaritime regulation
4 min read

Djibouti Carbon Pricing for Shipping: A Regional Scheme Worth Watching

As global trade grows and decarbonization pressures increase, the shipping industry is facing heightened scrutiny over its environmental impact. At…

Filip Lakomik
Cargo ship navigating EU ETS compliance.
complex regulationseu allowance euaeu emissionsmonitoring planshipping companies
5 min read

OceanScore identifies EU ETS best practice to tackle ‘strategy gaps’ on compliance

Many shipping companies are still striving to define their strategy for EU ETS compliance some 80 days after implementation of…

Filip Lakomik
Turn obligation into opportunity

Turn obligation into opportunity

Explore our maritime emissions compliance solutions designed to meet evolving regulations like EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime.

our clients and partners