EmissionsEU ETSEUAs
2 min read

Getting up to speed with the EU ETS: a guide to best practice

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant liabilities for the industry due to the requirement for shipping companies to purchase carbon credits to compensate for their annual emissions.    This presents a new set of challenges for shipping companies such as determining […]

Filip Lakomik
Shipping companies face compliance challenges under the EU ETS, requiring carbon credit purchases, data verification, and cost allocation strategies. Learn how to navigate these complexities.

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant liabilities for the industry due to the requirement for shipping companies to purchase carbon credits to compensate for their annual emissions. 

 

This presents a new set of challenges for shipping companies such as determining who is responsible for compliance with the EU ETS, who should pay for emissions, what contractual obligations need to be in place, data-handling and verification procedures, how to procure carbon credits, what trading platform to use and how to allocate costs across the value chain. 

 

In order to navigate these myriad complexities, administrative systems need to be set up with digital automation of the various processes to effectively manage and mitigate the risks and ensure efficient compliance with the regulation, given non-compliance can incur heavy financial penalties or even an EU trading ban for an entire fleet. 

 

OceanScore has been supporting dozens of partners in efficiently managing compliance with this regulation and securing end-to-end transparency to limit the inherent risks. In this series of blogs, we share some of our insights for EU ETS best practice to clarify the steps required.  

While not definitive, as the diverse nature of shipping requires a tailored approach, it is intended as a useful guide to help companies define their EU ETS strategy and avoid some of the pitfalls on the difficult path to compliance. 

Related posts

3 min read

FuelEU Maritime Forecasting: Managing Compliance Exposure Before It Becomes a Cost

FuelEU Maritime exposure develops continuously throughout the year. This article explains how compliance forecasting helps shipping companies manage cost, risk,…

Filip Lakomik
Cargo ship navigating EU ETS compliance.
complex regulationseu allowance euaeu emissionsmonitoring planshipping companies
5 min read

OceanScore identifies EU ETS best practice to tackle ‘strategy gaps’ on compliance

Many shipping companies are still striving to define their strategy for EU ETS compliance some 80 days after implementation of…

Filip Lakomik
OceanScore’s review of BIMCO’s FuelEU Maritime clause and its challenges.
carbon marketcarbon priceEmissionseu carbonEU ETSEuropean Commissionshipping companiesverified emissions
3 min read

EU ETS & MRV in Shipping: Defining Responsibility Between Owners and Managers

Shipping companies need to establish clear lines of responsibility both for reporting emissions under the EU’s MRV (Monitoring, Reporting and…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUFuelEU PoolingOPX
2 min read

OceanScore Pool-Price Index Market Commentary: January 2026

FuelEU pooling prices declined in January 2026 as surplus volumes increased following completion of the first compliance period. OceanScore’s OPX…

Filip Lakomik
3 min read

UK ETS Maritime: Preparing for a Confirmed 1 July 2026 Start

The UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) for maritime is now confirmed to launch on 1 July 2026, introducing new…

Filip Lakomik
3 min read

EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime: Challenges and Opportunities for Asian Shipping

Asian shipowners face unique challenges as EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime take full effect. Fewer European voyages, complex Union Registry…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUFuelEU PoolingOPX
2 min read

OceanScore Pool-Price Index Market Commentary: December 2025

With the ability to generate additional surplus limited by the approaching year-end, and demand picking up, prices for pooling edged…

Filip Lakomik
FuelEUFuelEU Pooling
2 min read

FuelEU Maritime Charterer Pooling: Will Your Charterer Pool?

As the first FuelEU Maritime compliance year comes to a close, the reality of pooling is taking shape. Based on…

Filip Lakomik
biofuelsFuelEUfueleu maritime regulationmaritime datashipping companies
5 min read

Decoding alternative fuels: OceanScore supports tricky bunker selection process under FuelEU Maritime

OceanScore’s FuelEU Planner helps shipping companies navigate fuel selection, compliance costs, and market dynamics to meet FuelEU Maritime regulations with…

Filip Lakomik
Stakeholders in the shipping industry discussing EUA cost allocation under EU ETS.
Best Practicescarbon marketEmissionseu carboneu emissionseu emissions trading systemEU ETSEUAsFuelEUfueleu maritime regulation
3 min read

Securing contractual clauses for EUA costs settlement 

Acquisition of EUAs constitutes a major cost burden for the responsible party so these costs need to be fairly allocated…

Filip Lakomik
Turn obligation into opportunity

Turn obligation into opportunity

Explore our maritime emissions compliance solutions designed to meet evolving regulations like EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime.

our clients and partners