OPX (2026) €225.00 $263,49 +15% to prev. month
EUA €68.86 $80.22 -0.86% to prev. day
carbon dioxide equivalentEmissionsemissions trading system eueu emissionseu emissions trading systemEU ETSEUAsEuropean Union emissions tradingsecondary market
3 min read

EUA Trading Strategy for Shipping: How to Buy EU Allowances Efficiently

EUAs can be purchased at a fixed price at auctions arranged during the year by the European Energy Exchange. They can also be bought and sold on the secondary market through brokers or online trading platforms at a price that fluctuates with supply and demand, The variable price reflects the cost of reducing emissions.    When […]

OceanScore
Shipping industry professionals discussing EUA procurement strategies and emissions cost management.

EUAs can be purchased at a fixed price at auctions arranged during the year by the European Energy Exchange. They can also be bought and sold on the secondary market through brokers or online trading platforms at a price that fluctuates with supply and demand, The variable price reflects the cost of reducing emissions.   


When determining an EUA procurement strategy, key considerations are to assess the volume of allowances required based on expected emissions and to select a competent trading partner – whether it be a bank, shipbroker or carbon broker. 


Simple buying strategies and streamlined trading structures represent the best way forward, with one or a maximum of two EUA trading partners. There is little to be gained from setting up multiple sources and trading agreements, or spending time on finding the lowest possible price, as prices will not differ much by source. 

 

From the perspective of an owner or manager, the important aspects of such a strategy are: 

  • Flexibility to buy odd volumes – the exact numbers needed rather than bundles, as only a few EUAs may need to be purchased for periods of off-hire or unemployment. 
  • The ability to trade EUAs in case of excess. 
  • Purchase of spot and forwards through the same source to avoid complexity. 
  • Access to a digital, state-of-the-art trading interface


In general, we advise owners/managers against speculation with EUA purchasing, but rather that they focus on meeting their actual requirements for emissions incurred with off-hire or unemployment. The decision between buying forwards (not futures, in our view) or spot largely depends on liquidity needs and the company’s cost of capital.  


However, the buying approach may become more intricate when vessels are fixed with payments from cargo owners to cover EUA costs. In such cases, owners would secure the needed EUAs as forwards at the contract-assumed price, aligning the execution date for the forward around when they are due to receive payment for the transport. 


Similarly, there may be instances where charterers might not be able to provide EUAs but instead will provide funds for the owner/manager to buy EUAs.  


In cases of parcelling where cargo shipments are divided or grouped into distinct units, such as in the tanker or heavy-lift business, we initially looked at allocating EUAs to different parcels. However, we now recommend the induced costs of transport in European waters are incorporated into commercial discussions and pricing decisions. This approach simplifies matters and gains acceptance from most customers. If specific customers want to contribute EUAs, this can be factored in separately.  

Related posts

OceanScore’s review of BIMCO’s FuelEU Maritime clause and its challenges.
carbon marketcarbon priceEmissionseu carbonEU ETSEuropean Commissionshipping companiesverified emissions
3 min read

EU ETS & MRV in Shipping: Defining Responsibility Between Owners and Managers

Shipping companies need to establish clear lines of responsibility both for reporting emissions under the EU’s MRV (Monitoring, Reporting and…

OceanScore
Group of OceanScore team members and event attendees posing together at an industry event during the launch of the FuelEU Planner
BudgetingFuelEUfueleu plannerlaunchmaritime operations
4 min read

FuelEU Planner: OceanScore Launches Compliance Planning Tool for Shipping

OceanScore launches the FuelEU Planner, a tool to help shipping companies optimize compliance with FuelEU Maritime, offering simulations and budgeting…

OceanScore
DoC HolderEU ETSFuelEUfueleu maritime regulationimoMEPC83
3 min read

MEPC 83: The New Global Carbon Rules

MEPC83 approves complex global GHG reduction rules for shipping, introducing dual thresholds, remedial units, and a FuelEU-like system starting 2028.

OceanScore
FuelEUpooling
4 min read

FuelEU Maritime Pooling: A Viable Strategy

FuelEU allows for pooling compliance deficits and surpluses as one way to secure compliance. OceanScore analyses continues to show that…

OceanScore
3 min read

OceanScore September Highlights: FuelEU Pooling Transparency & Shipping Compliance Updates

September 2025 was a month of milestones for OceanScore, from the launch of OPX (, our transparent FuelEU Pool-Price Index, to…

OceanScore
Newsletter banner for OceanScores January 2026 Pool-Price Index Market Commentary, featuring an aerial view of a large container ship moving through the ocean.
FuelEUFuelEU PoolingOPX
2 min read

OceanScore Pool-Price Index Market Commentary: January 2026

FuelEU pooling prices declined in January 2026 as surplus volumes increased following completion of the first compliance period. OceanScore’s OPX…

Albrecht Grell
Ships calling at ports in the EU will be liable for the cost of their emissions from 2024 onwards
emission reductionsemissions trading system eueu emissionsEU ETSeu ets management
5 min read

OceanScore and RWE team up to mitigate emissions risk with EU ETS management solution for shipping

OceanScore launches ETS Manager, a solution to help shipping companies manage emissions and trade carbon credits under the EU ETS…

OceanScore
Portrait of Ralf Garrn, co managing director of OceanScore wearing glasses displayed alongside an OceanScore blog headline discussing estimated €175 million FuelEU Maritime compliance costs for Greek shipping
FuelEUfueleu maritime regulationmaritime datamaritime operationsmaritime regulation
5 min read

OceanScore calculates €175m potential costs for Greek shipping with FuelEU Maritime

Greek shipping companies may face over €175m in penalties under FuelEU Maritime. OceanScore provides tools to optimize fuel selection, reduce…

OceanScore
6 min read

EU Ports Strategy 2026: What It Means for Port Emissions, Digitalisation and Decarbonisation

The EU Ports Strategy 2026 sets clear priorities for emissions reduction, digitalisation and resilience. As ports move from ambition to…

Damla Hasenclever
FuelEUFuelEU Pooling
3 min read

FuelEU Pooling in 2026: From Commercial Agreement to Verified Compliance Process

FuelEU pooling in 2026 is no longer just a commercial agreement. Surplus transfers must be formally reported, approved by all…

Damla Hasenclever
Turn obligation into opportunity

Turn obligation into opportunity

Explore our maritime emissions compliance solutions designed to meet evolving regulations like EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime.

our clients and partners