carbon dioxide equivalentEmissionsemissions trading system eueu emissionseu emissions trading systemEU ETSEUAsEuropean Union emissions tradingsecondary market
3 min read

Determining a trading strategy for EUAs

EUAs can be purchased at a fixed price at auctions arranged during the year by the European Energy Exchange. They…

OceanScore
Shipping industry professionals discussing EUA procurement strategies and emissions cost management.

EUAs can be purchased at a fixed price at auctions arranged during the year by the European Energy Exchange. They can also be bought and sold on the secondary market through brokers or online trading platforms at a price that fluctuates with supply and demand, The variable price reflects the cost of reducing emissions.   


When determining an EUA procurement strategy, key considerations are to assess the volume of allowances required based on expected emissions and to select a competent trading partner – whether it be a bank, shipbroker or carbon broker. 


Simple buying strategies and streamlined trading structures represent the best way forward, with one or a maximum of two EUA trading partners. There is little to be gained from setting up multiple sources and trading agreements, or spending time on finding the lowest possible price, as prices will not differ much by source. 

 

From the perspective of an owner or manager, the important aspects of such a strategy are: 

  • Flexibility to buy odd volumes – the exact numbers needed rather than bundles, as only a few EUAs may need to be purchased for periods of off-hire or unemployment. 
  • The ability to trade EUAs in case of excess. 
  • Purchase of spot and forwards through the same source to avoid complexity. 
  • Access to a digital, state-of-the-art trading interface


In general, we advise owners/managers against speculation with EUA purchasing, but rather that they focus on meeting their actual requirements for emissions incurred with off-hire or unemployment. The decision between buying forwards (not futures, in our view) or spot largely depends on liquidity needs and the company’s cost of capital.  


However, the buying approach may become more intricate when vessels are fixed with payments from cargo owners to cover EUA costs. In such cases, owners would secure the needed EUAs as forwards at the contract-assumed price, aligning the execution date for the forward around when they are due to receive payment for the transport. 


Similarly, there may be instances where charterers might not be able to provide EUAs but instead will provide funds for the owner/manager to buy EUAs.  


In cases of parcelling where cargo shipments are divided or grouped into distinct units, such as in the tanker or heavy-lift business, we initially looked at allocating EUAs to different parcels. However, we now recommend the induced costs of transport in European waters are incorporated into commercial discussions and pricing decisions. This approach simplifies matters and gains acceptance from most customers. If specific customers want to contribute EUAs, this can be factored in separately.  

Related posts

3 min read

EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime: Challenges and Opportunities for Asian Shipping

Asian shipowners face unique challenges as EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime take full effect. Fewer European voyages, complex Union Registry…

OceanScore
Shipping companies managing EU ETS carbon credit trading and compliance risks.
emissions trading system eueu allowance euaeu carbonEU ETSeu ets management
7 min read

Trading places: shipping must manage new financial risks with transition to EU ETS, says OceanScore

A collaboration agreement has been signed between a classification society ClassNK and a maritime data and technology firm OceanScore to…

OceanScore
FuelEU pooling marketplace
5 min read

Maritime Compliance Trading: Turning Emissions Rules into Carbon Opportunities and Marketplaces

The Regulatory Landscape: Fast, Complex, and Overlapping   Regulation in maritime decarbonisation continues at unrelenting speed, and with it, the…

OceanScore
OceanScore’s review of BIMCO’s FuelEU Maritime clause and its challenges.
carbon marketcarbon priceEmissionseu carbonEU ETSEuropean Commissionshipping companiesverified emissions
3 min read

Clearly defining responsibility

Shipping companies need to establish clear lines of responsibility both for reporting emissions under the EU’s MRV (Monitoring, Reporting and…

OceanScore
FuelEUFuelEU PoolingOPX
1 min read

OceanScore Pool-Price Index Market Commentary: November 2025

With the ability to generate additional surplus limited by the approaching year-end, and demand picking up, prices for pooling edged…

Albrecht Grell
FuelEUfueleu maritime regulationimointernational maritime organisationshipping challenges
2 min read

FuelEU Maritime: 4 Pressing Challenges Facing Shipping in 2025

FuelEU Charter Party impact shipping compliance costs. OceanScore’s FuelEU Planner helps with cost risks & pooling strategies with precision

OceanScore
cargoeu emissions trading systemEuropean Commissiongreenhouse gas emissionsmaritime operationsmaritime operator holdingshipping companiesunion registry
5 min read

Health check: pain points, lessons learned and best practice

OceanScore has been assessing early experiences as companies adapt to the EU ETS post-implementation, based on feedback from over 70…

OceanScore
fueleu charter party clausesfueleu maritime regulation
4 min read

De-Risk Your FuelEU Charter Party Clauses: Navigate Complexity with Confidence

As the maritime industry adapts to new environmental regulations, FuelEU Charter Party clauses have emerged as a significant challenge for…

OceanScore
eu emissions trading systemFuelEUfueleu maritime regulationfueleu plannermaritime regulation
6 min read

Running the numbers: OceanScore reveals ship segments set to feel €1.3bn sting of FuelEU penalties

OceanScore analyzes the financial impact of FuelEU Maritime regulations, forecasting penalties for various shipping sectors. The report highlights key areas…

OceanScore
Shipping companies face compliance challenges under the EU ETS, requiring carbon credit purchases, data verification, and cost allocation strategies. Learn how to navigate these complexities.
EmissionsEU ETSEUAs
2 min read

Getting up to speed with the EU ETS: a guide to best practice

Implementation of the EU ETS for shipping from 1 January 2024 entails new regulatory complexity and financial risk with significant…

OceanScore
Turn obligation into opportunity

Turn obligation into opportunity

Explore our maritime emissions compliance solutions designed to meet evolving regulations like EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime.

our clients and partners